Key Psychological Effects with Explanations
- Pygmalion Effect:
When higher expectations are placed on individuals, they tend to perform better. This is because people often rise to the level of the expectations set for them. In educational and workplace settings, when teachers or managers believe in someone’s potential, it can boost motivation and performance (Rosenthal & Jacobson). - Golem Effect:
The opposite of the Pygmalion Effect. When lower expectations are set, people tend to perform worse. If a teacher or supervisor expects poor performance from a student or employee, they may unconsciously convey this, leading the person to underperform as a result (Rosenthal & Jacobson). - IKEA Effect:
People tend to value items or projects more when they have put effort into creating them. For example, you may feel a stronger attachment to a piece of furniture you assembled yourself, even if it isn’t perfect, because the effort you invested enhances its perceived value (Norton, Mochon, & Ariely). - Spotlight Effect:
This refers to our tendency to overestimate how much others notice or care about our actions or appearance. In reality, most people are too focused on their own concerns to pay much attention to what we are doing. This is common in social situations, where you might feel like all eyes are on you, but most likely, they’re not (Gilovich & Savitsky). - Backfire Effect:
When people are presented with evidence that contradicts their beliefs, instead of changing their opinions, they often double down and become more entrenched in their views. This is particularly common in political or ideological discussions (Nyhan & Reifler). - Sunk Cost Fallacy:
This occurs when people continue to invest in a decision or project because they have already invested time, money, or effort, even though it no longer benefits them. For example, continuing to watch a boring movie just because you’ve already watched half of it (Thaler). - Priming Effect:
The exposure to one stimulus influences how you respond to another. For example, if you’ve just read a list of words related to cleanliness, you might be more likely to interpret ambiguous situations as being about hygiene. It’s an unconscious process that can shape decision-making and behavior (Bargh, Zajonc, & Lazarus). - Serial Position Effect:
People are more likely to remember the first (primacy effect) and last (recency effect) items in a list, while middle items are often forgotten. This is relevant in learning, advertising, and public speaking, where positioning of information can affect recall (Ebbinghaus). - Hindsight Bias:
After an event occurs, people often believe they “knew it all along.” This can distort how people view past decisions and outcomes, making them think they predicted the result when, in reality, it wasn’t clear beforehand (Fischhoff). - False Consensus Effect:
People tend to overestimate how much others agree with their beliefs, values, or behaviors. This can lead to misunderstandings in social and political contexts, where individuals think their opinions are more widespread than they actually are (Ross, Greene, & House). - Mere Exposure Effect:
People tend to develop a preference for things they are repeatedly exposed to. This can apply to music, products, or even people. The more familiar you become with something, the more likely you are to like it, even if it didn’t appeal to you initially (Zajonc). - Actor-Observer Bias:
When judging others, we attribute their actions to their personality or character (internal factors), but when evaluating our own actions, we tend to blame external circumstances. For instance, if someone else is late, you might think they’re irresponsible, but if you’re late, it’s because of traffic or an emergency (Jones & Nisbett). - Broken Windows Theory:
This theory suggests that visible signs of disorder (like broken windows, graffiti, or litter) encourage further crime and anti-social behavior. Maintaining order in communities or environments can help deter further deterioration and negative behavior (Wilson & Kelling).
1 comment